Skip to calculator
Veomark

Free · Instant · No signup

Roth IRA vs Traditional IRA Growth Calculator

After-tax future value of Roth versus traditional at a chosen withdrawal tax rate.

Page updated 2026-09-04.

Roth IRA vs Traditional IRA Growth Calculator visual
Sponsored

Calculator

Default $7,000.

Default 25.

Default 7%.

Traditional deduction value / Roth paid now. Default 22%.

Applied to traditional withdrawals. Default 18%.

Calculated Results

Roth after-tax

--

Traditional after-tax

--

Roth minus traditional

--

Sponsored

Same contribution, two different tax treatments

Contributing $7,000/year for 25 years at an assumed 7% return, a Roth IRA (taxed at 22% before investing, tax-free after) ends with $345,339.75 after tax. A Traditional IRA (contributed pre-tax, taxed at an assumed 18% rate in retirement) ends with $363,049.48 after tax -- $17,709.73 more than Roth in this example.

Traditional wins here specifically because the retirement tax rate (18%) is lower than the contribution-year tax rate (22%). If those two rates were reversed -- a lower rate now than in retirement -- Roth would come out ahead instead, since a Roth locks in the contribution-year rate rather than the eventual withdrawal rate.

This comparison assumes the same $7,000 nominal contribution to both accounts, which slightly favors Traditional in practice: since Traditional contributions are pre-tax, a fair comparison would let the Roth contribution be reduced by the immediate tax paid, or grossed the Traditional contribution up to match Roth's after-tax cost -- this simplified model uses the same number for both.

The one input that decides the outcome

Ignores contribution limits, MAGI phaseouts, and RMDs. Not tax advice. The entire result hinges on the gap between nowTax and laterTax -- your actual tax rate 25 years from now is a guess, not a known number, so treat the 'winner' label as sensitive to that assumption rather than a fixed conclusion.

Contribution amount and years must both be greater than zero for either projection to run.

This model also doesn't account for annual contribution limits (which are far below $7,000 x 25 years of unconstrained growth in real dollar terms once IRS limits and catch-up contributions are factored in) or required minimum distributions on the Traditional side -- for RMD math specifically, see the IRA Required Minimum Distribution Calculator.

Related retirement-account decisions

If your employer offers a 401(k) match, that's typically a better first dollar than either IRA type since it's an immediate 100%-plus return -- check it on the 401(k) Employer Match Calculator before maxing an IRA.

An HSA is technically the most tax-advantaged account available to those who qualify (pre-tax in, tax-free growth, tax-free out for medical expenses) -- see the HSA Contribution Tax Savings Calculator for that comparison.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Why does Traditional win by $17,709.73 in the default example?

Because the assumed retirement tax rate (18%) is lower than the assumed contribution-year rate (22%). Traditional IRA math rewards a lower tax bracket in retirement than during your working years; Roth rewards the opposite.

What would flip the result in favor of Roth?

Setting the retirement tax rate (laterTax) higher than the contribution-year rate (nowTax). If you expect to be in a higher bracket in retirement than you are now, Roth's tax-free withdrawals become more valuable than Traditional's upfront deduction.

Does this account for annual IRA contribution limits?

No. Ignores contribution limits, MAGI phaseouts, and RMDs. Not tax advice. It projects a flat $7,000/year (or whatever you enter) without checking it against the actual annual IRS limit, which changes yearly and varies by age.

Is comparing the same $7,000 contribution to both accounts a fair comparison?

It's a simplification. Since Traditional contributions are pre-tax, a stricter comparison would either reduce the Roth contribution by the tax paid up front or increase the Traditional contribution to match Roth's after-tax cost. This calculator uses the same nominal amount for both, which is the commonly used simplified version of this comparison.

Does this factor in required minimum distributions (RMDs)?

No. Traditional IRAs are subject to RMDs starting at a certain age; Roth IRAs are not (for the original owner). That distinction isn't modeled here -- it only compares after-tax ending value at your chosen withdrawal year.